![]() ![]() Entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity.Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.Purely philosophical assertions which do not pertain to theology should not be solemnly condemned or forbidden by anyone, because in connection with such anyone at all ought to be free to say freely what pleases him.Therefore consider now which seems the more probable to you. You see that I have set out opposing assertions in response to your question and I have touched on quite strong arguments in support of each position. To decide by way of teaching, therefore, which assertion should be considered catholic, which heretical, chiefly pertains to theologians, the experts on divine scripture. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take his part out of the book of life and out of the holy city, and from these things that are written in this book." We clearly gather from all these that nothing should be added to sacred scripture nor anything removed from it. The Holy Spirit through blessed John the evangelist makes a terrible threat against those who add anything to or take anything from divine scripture when he says in the last chapter of Revelations, "If any man shall add to these things, God shall add unto him the plagues which are in this book. ![]() 2, as translated by John Kilcullen and John Scott (2003). For if some assertion were found to be opposed to decrees of the highest pontiffs, or also of general councils or also to laws of the emperors, nevertheless, if it were not in conflict with theology, even if it could be considered false, erroneous or unjust, it should not be counted as a heresy. ![]() For only an assertion which is consonant with theology is truly catholic, and only one which is known to be opposed to theology is known to be heretical.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |